What Analysts Tell Us About Their Learning Journey

We've worked with hundreds of financial professionals since launching our structured training approach in 2022. Most came to us frustrated with generic courses that taught Excel shortcuts but ignored the reasoning behind model architecture.

These aren't carefully curated success stories—they're real conversations about what worked, what didn't, and how people actually use what they learned three months later.

Financial analyst reviewing detailed modeling frameworks on multiple screens during training session

The Feedback That Surprised Us

When we surveyed our January 2025 cohort, we expected comments about technical skills. Instead, people kept mentioning confidence. One participant wrote that she finally understood why her manager structured models a certain way—it wasn't about formulas, but about creating audit trails that survive scrutiny.

Another analyst mentioned he stopped second-guessing his discount rate assumptions because he could now articulate the reasoning behind each component. That's the shift we care about.

Common Theme We Hear Most participants mention they can now defend their models in meetings without feeling like they're winging it. That practical confidence shows up in performance reviews faster than any certification badge.

What People Struggle With Honestly? The first two weeks are tough. We don't sugarcoat the learning curve. One analyst told us he almost quit after the third session because it felt overwhelming—then something clicked around week four and the concepts started connecting.

One Analyst's Perspective

Tamsyn Garrick completed our program in March 2025 while working at a mid-sized investment firm in Sydney. Her experience reflects what we hear most often.

Tamsyn Garrick Associate Analyst, Infrastructure Finance

I'd been building DCF models for eighteen months but always felt like I was following templates without understanding the architecture. What changed for me wasn't learning new functions—it was understanding how experienced analysts think through sensitivity analysis and scenario planning. Now when I present to senior leadership, I can explain not just what the numbers show, but why I structured the analysis that way. That distinction matters more than I expected.

Tamsyn joined our autumn 2024 cohort specifically to improve her ability to build custom models rather than relying on firm templates. She mentioned the most valuable part was the peer review sessions where participants critiqued each other's approaches—something she didn't expect to appreciate as much as she did.

Realistic Outcomes People Experience

We track what happens after people finish our program—not through surveys, but through actual follow-up conversations. Here's what we consistently hear about six months later.

Faster Model Building

Most analysts mention they can build models about 40% faster because they're not constantly googling formula syntax or restructuring their worksheets halfway through.

One participant built a three-statement model for a pitch deck in four hours—something that previously took him two days of trial and error.

Better Meeting Preparation

People report feeling prepared when stakeholders ask challenging questions about assumptions. You can actually defend your choices instead of frantically checking your notes.

An analyst mentioned her director stopped sending models back for revisions because her documentation improved significantly.

Independent Problem-Solving

Instead of constantly asking senior analysts for help, participants figure out solutions themselves by understanding the underlying logic.

One person mentioned he finally understood how to build flexible scenario models—something he'd been copying from templates for months without really grasping.

Group discussion during financial modeling workshop with analysts collaborating on complex scenarios

The Part Nobody Talks About

Learning financial modeling isn't linear. Some concepts click immediately while others take weeks to internalize. We've had analysts tell us they understood the theory during class but only truly got it when they applied it to a real project two months later.

That delayed comprehension is normal—and it's why we offer ongoing access to course materials and monthly office hours. The learning doesn't stop when the formal program ends; it continues as you encounter new modeling challenges in your actual work.

Explore Program Structure